Voices without a vote are speaking to YOU

[wp_lightbox_prettyPhoto_video link=”http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VuCaWYvpVZg” title=”Voices without a vote are speaking to YOU” source=”http://cptexas.us/home/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/voices.png”]

Click image to view video


Elections Should Belong To The People

For most of the Twentieth Century (and now into the Twenty First Century), the American citizenry has had precious little say about who represents them in Washington, D.C., as well as in many, if not most, State posts. Oh, I realize that every two years the American people (well, about half of those who are eligible) go through the motions of voting. (They did that in Venezuela, too, didn’t they?) But the truth of the matter is elections have become almost exclusively the domain of the well-financed special interest groups that control the two major parties. The individual citizen has almost no voice–especially in national elections.

Without trying to beat a dead horse, I want to mention again what the national Republican Party machine (along with the national news media) did to Ron Paul and his supporters in this year’s primary elections proves beyond any shadow of a doubt the deceit, duplicity, and dishonesty that defines major party politics. Anyone who believes that Mitt Romney won his party’s nomination freely and fairly is either totally ignorant of what really happened or is thoroughly deluded. And unless people in Venezuela were killed or imprisoned, Ron Paul’s supporters were no less mistreated than were Hugo Chaves’ opponents.

When I was nominated by the Constitution Party in 2008, I became one of only six Presidential candidates who were on enough State ballots that year to theoretically have the potential to obtain enough electoral votes to win the Presidency. The others were Bob Barr (Libertarian), Ralph Nader (Independent), Cynthia McKinney (Green), Barack Obama (Democrat), and John McCain (Republican). But of course, the only candidates that were allowed to participate in the national debates were Obama and McCain. Why? The two major parties control the Presidential Debate Commission.

Do readers not find it more than interesting that when the US government took control of Iraq, they demanded that Iraqi elections reflect and represent the entire country and insisted that Iraqi elections be open to “all.” That’s why you saw over twenty, or maybe even thirty, different political parties participate in Iraq’s elections. This was done with the approbation and, in fact, insistence of the US government. Yet, in here in America, only two parties are allowed to fully participate in the election process: the Democrat and Republican parties.

In any given Presidential election only about half of qualified voters in this country (more or less) bother to go to the polls and vote. That means our President is elected with a little over one quarter of the voters’ support. That’s hardly a majority! And the reason that most of those people who don’t vote stay home is because they are totally frustrated with the American political system. They have zero confidence in either major political party or the puppet Presidential candidates that they put before the American people. Who can blame them?

Since the two major parties control the election process, they have made it almost impossible for third parties, or even non-establishment party candidates within the two major parties, to succeed. Election laws at the federal and State levels are so egregiously discriminating that anyone who is deemed an “outsider” (meaning, non-establishment) rarely prevails.

Here in Montana, a Constitution Party candidate, Rick Jore, was elected to the Montana House of Representatives a few years ago. And I’m sure that one could locate a smidgen of local or State races that were won by Libertarian Party candidates. Of course, the biggest prize won by a third party candidate in recent memory was the election of Jesse Ventura (Libertarian Party) as Minnesota’s governor back in 1998. But that’s it.

Of course, back when America was a lot freer, having multiple parties represented in a national election was much more common. For example, Abraham Lincoln was one of six major party candidates, and he won with only 39% of the vote. And by today’s definition, Lincoln’s Republican Party would have been considered a “third” party by the political establishment. Yet, the political process freely accommodated no less than six parties in the election of 1860. Is it a coincidence that in 2008 six Presidential candidates met the threshold of being on enough State ballots to theoretically win the election? If the same rules governing national elections that apply today had applied in 1860, Lincoln would have never gone to the White House.

And there is no more egregious example of the way election rules violate a free and fair election process than the manner in which individuals are prohibited from contributing to a candidate’s campaign. Both federal and most State election laws set limits (meager at that) on how much money an individual may give to their preferred candidate. Yet, there is absolutely no limit to what the candidate himself or herself might donate to his or her own campaign. And there is almost no limit to what special interest PACs are able to give. You call this free? You call this fair?

For example, when I ran in 2008, a man wanted to donate $2 million to my campaign (a paltry sum compared to what the two major party candidates receive), but was not allowed to do so, because of federal elections laws–which were put in place by the two major parties, of course. And many others wanted to give generous amounts as well but were likewise prohibited from doing so.

So, the net result is only the rich and powerfully connected good-old-boys are able to prevail in most elections. If one is not extremely wealthy or extremely articulate and charismatic or extremely lucky, the only people who have a chance at winning even local races are elitist establishment types. Thankfully, in spite of the deck being stacked against “real” people, some manage to prevail–mostly at the State and local levels, of course. But almost always after arriving at their State capitol or county seat, they find themselves vastly outnumbered. And, as Sonny and Cher sang, “The Beat Goes On.”

And this column isn’t even dealing with the subject of vote fraud, which is a real issue that hardly anyone wants to talk about. And, yes, there is enough evidence to dogmatically say that vote fraud was employed in the primaries against Ron Paul in more than one State.

Here in the State of Montana, included on every ballot is a line underneath each race that voters can write “No,” or “None of the above.” Should “No” receive more votes than the candidates listed, a special election would have to be called with new candidates. I don’t mind telling you that I will be voting “No” on several races this year. I wonder what would happen if just one time–one time!–voters rejected both candidates for a given race. Wouldn’t you love to see that happen just once? Wow! I sure would. I am sick to my stomach of having to choose between CFR candidate A and CFR candidate B, between elitist establishment candidate A and elitist establishment candidate B. Aren’t you?

At some point, the American people have got to take back their elections, because right now they don’t belong to the people; they belong to the elitist establishment. And that’s why it normally doesn’t matter to a tinker’s dam who gets elected. And that’s why nothing changes. And that’s also why about half of the American people don’t even bother to vote. But instead of not voting, I wish they would all show up on November 6 and vote “None of the above” and send these elitist creeps back where they came from.

Cures For Cancer – Congress Doesn’t Want You To Know

Americans have been ravaged by various forms of cancer for decades. When I lived in Sacramento, I used to listen to a radio station that played big bands and old crooners like Frank Sinatra. They used to play a commercial which said one in three Americans will get cancer this year as if they were talking about someone getting a cold. How many people in this country don’t have a family member who has been struck down by one form of cancer or another?

Why are so many Americans getting cancer? Before I give my opinion, I have to say it is my opinion only. I’m not a doctor and have no medical training nor am I dispensing medical advice. I have to say that so the gangsters at the Federal Death Administration (FDA) or DHS (Department of Fatherland Security) don’t send their jack booted thugs to my front door and arrest me for “practicing medicine.”

What is cancer?

“Cancer is a class of diseases characterized by out-of-control cell growth. There are over 100 different types of cancer, and each is classified by the type of cell that is initially affected. Cancer harms the body when damaged cells divide uncontrollably to form lumps or masses of tissue called tumors (except in the case of leukemia where cancer prohibits normal blood function by abnormal cell division in the blood stream). Tumors can grow and interfere with the digestive, nervous, and circulatory systems, and they can release hormones that alter body function.

“Carcinogens – Carcinogens are a class of substances that are directly responsible for damaging DNA, promoting or aiding cancer. Tobacco, asbestos, arsenic, radiation such as gamma and x-rays, the sun, and compounds in car exhaust fumes are all examples of carcinogens. When our bodies are exposed to carcinogens, free radicals are formed that try to steal electrons from other molecules in the body. Theses free radicals damage cells and affect their ability to function normally.”

America has become known as the fattest country on earth. How shameful. You are what you eat is a maxim ignored by tens of millions who line up to the hog trough, eating all the wrong foods in copious amounts – some which are known to contribute to developing some forms of cancer:

The top five cancer-causing foods

I have never had nor will I ever get a mammogram. There is a great deal women don’t know about mammograms:

Mammograms, X-rays may increase breast cancer risk in some women with specific genetic mutations

How about the ever popular abortion? Over 52 MILLION innocent little babies murdered in the womb. Some females have multiple abortions, but look at the tens and tens of millions who are at great risk of breast cancer. Where are the warnings from Nancy Pelosi and the rest of the peddlers of death?

Study: Recent Depo Provera Use Increases Invasive Breast Cancer Risk 2.2-fold When Used 12 Months or More

Say ‘no’ to carcinogen as contraception alternative

“This has to be the first time in medical history that doctors have made it a consistent practice to tell patients to take a carcinogen to prevent cancer. They’re not just doing it in Africa. They do it in the U.S. too. Would male physicians and scientists ever think of taking a carcinogen to reduce cancer risk?”

Biological Explanation: How Abortion Causes Breast Cancer

How many ore will die before FDA ghouls are held accountable? (July 2008)

“How about the widely popular, HRT (hormone replacement therapy) drug, Prempro, found in the government’s own study to increase a healthy woman’s risk of breast cancer by 24%, stroke by 41% and heart attack by 29%?

“April 24, 2007. 70 women ‘die each year from cancer after taking HRT. “But the UK-sponsored Million Women Study now suggests HRT resulted in 1,300 extra cases of ovarian cancer between 1991 and 2005. Of these women, 1,000 died of the disease.”

“2008: Wyeth, Pfizer ordered to pay $27 million in punitive damages. “A Little Rock, Ark., federal jury found Wyeth Pharmaceuticals and Upjohn (a Pfizer unit) liable for $27 million in punitive damages to Donna Scroggin, who sued the drug manufacturers in 2004 after developing breast cancer after taking hormone replacement therapy. The award includes $19.3 million from Wyeth and $7.7 from Upjohn.

“Wyeth manufactures Premarin, an estrogen replacement, and Prempro, which is a combination of estrogen and progestin. These, along with Upjohn’s Provera, which contains progestin, are commonly prescribed to treat the unpleasant effects of menopause….About 25 million American women use hormone replacement therapy (HRT) to ease the discomfort of menopause. There are about 5,300 similar cases pending across the country for Premarin and Prempro.”

“Here’s a news flash: These dangerous cocktails are still on the market and being prescribed! I’ve never taken any form of HRT and am truly thankful I listened to my friend, Dr. Lorraine Day, 14 years ago. The 25 million women who use HRT’s in this country just might be ‘concerned’ they will end up dead from breast and/or cervical cancer. I don’t understand why anyone would take these drugs once you read the side effects: “Long-term treatment with Prempro may increase your risk of breast cancer, heart attack, or stroke.”

How about cell phones, cell phone towers and ‘smart’ meters?

Smart Meters – The new silent killer – Sept 2, 2011 – Two part series. Both have links in the columns and at the bottom that contain critical information.

About half way down in my column:

“Sworn Declaration of Dr. David O. Carpenter, M.D., Director, Institute for Health and the Environment, University at Albany and Professor of Environmental Health Sciences within the School of Public Health. Formerly Dean of the School of Public Health at the University of Albany and Director of the Wadsworth Center for Laboratories and Research of the New York State Department of Health. United States District Court – District of Oregon – Portland Division – June 2011

“Exposure to EMF has been linked to a variety of adverse health outcomes. The health endpoints that have been reported to be associated with ELF and/or RF include childhood leukemia, adult brain tumors, childhood brain tumors, genotoxic effects (DNA damage and micronucleation), neurological effects and neurodegenerative disease (like ALS and Alzheimer’s), immune system disregulation, allergic and inflammatory responses, breast cancer in men and women, miscarriage and some cardiovascular effects. The strongest evidence for adverse health effects of EMFs comes from associations observed in human populations with two forms of cancer: childhood leukemia and chronic lymphocytic leukemia in occupationally exposed adults.’ Rest is at the link above and a link to ‘Before The Public Utilities Commission of the State of California (July 16, 2011).”

The Internet is filled with credible scientific studies and opinions from doctors and scientists about the link to cancer, cell phones and towers. People all over this country are fighting cell phone towers being built near homes and schools.

For those who might not know, the absolute cesspool of corruption called the FDA and the U.S. Congress continue to harass and destroy the lives of physicians who have cured cancer. I’m not talking about some snake oil salesman or some quack doctor who sells a formula of mumbo jumbo elixer. I’m talking about doctors who really understand the human body and cancer. I’m talking about doctors who actually cure cancers, but are persecuted by the FDA with the blessing of YOUR member of Congress and mine. For decades, one of the two “treatments” allowed by mother government is chemotherapy which ravages the body and destroys the body’s natural ability to fight off cancer. How backward is that? Of course, there’s radiation and tons of pills for the treatment.

Chemotherapy backfires – causes healthy cells to feed growth of cancer tumors

There’s no money in the cure, only the treatment and the cancer industry is BIG business:

National Cancer Institute

“What was NCI’s budget for Fiscal Year (FY) 2010? How has the budget changed in recent years?

“NCI’s budget for FY 2010 was $5.1* billion, excluding the additional $1.3* billion in American Recovery and Reinvestment Act funds received by the Institute for spending in FY 2009 and FY 2010. Overall, NCI’s budget has been relatively flat in recent years. During the period from 2005 through 2010, the NCI budget averaged $4.9* billion per year.”

How about the billions of prescriptions to “treat” cancer?

In 2011, Americans spent $23 billion for cancer drugs.

When you stop and think about it, those massive amounts of money, the number of jobs held in the cancer industry – because that’s what it has become – is a huge amount of fuel driving our economy:

Billions Spent On A Cure For Cancer And Yet Cancer Rates Continue To Explode? “If the U.S. health care system was a country, it would be the 6th largest economy in the entire world.”

One would think the liars and thieves in the US Congress would want Americans to know there ARE cures to many types of cancers that don’t require going into bankruptcy to afford or mutilating their bodies while destroying their nature immune system. Do you know how much money is used to bribe members of the Outlaw Congress from pharmaceutical companies who don’t want you to know there are natural cures for cancer? Follow the money — go look at the evidence – triple digit hundreds of millions.

I’m telling you flat out Congress does not want you to know there are cures for cancer. Sure, there are members of Congress over the past five decades who are darn closer to being illiterate. There are too many of them who don’t have a clue and do not take the time to actually investigate this issue. It is grossly irresponsible for the U.S. Congress to ignore the cures for cancer in favor of killing people with “conventional” treatment. It always goes back to money:

The Biggest Moneymaker of all Time: Cancer, and Why the Profiteers Don’t Want a Cure

“Even new clothing has been treated with chemicals that can seep into the body and wreak havoc especially in young children. Not to mention the pesticides that are used on your food. What is very interesting is how many people from Monsanto wind up working for the FDA. The FDA is supposed to protect US citizens from poisons, right? Do enough of your own research and the more you learn the more outraged you will become. This is what is meant by the wolf guarding the hen house. They eat healthy, sure. And you can bet the ranch they don’t eat the food they sell.

“Dr Max Gerson, who in 1938 made a startling discovery that his safe natural treatment for cancer patients held enormous promise. He was getting people well by using something that could not be patented – vegetables. At this time in history, a bill was appropriated for 100 million dollars to anyone who could show promise and results in treating cancer. Dr Gerson in 1946 presented 5 terminal cases and 5 additional patients’ records showing his effective treatment and cure of all of these cases. Well, guess what? The Pepper-Neely bill was defeated by four senators who were medical doctors.

“Also of note, radio announcer Raymond Gram Swing who was in the room, was as astonished as any of the others and made a broadcast that night detailing these events and Gerson’s effective treatment. Two 2 weeks later, Swing was fired from his job. The following video is life changing. The angel Charlotte Gerson is still alive and living in San Diego.” Do watch the video in that link.

The crooks in the Outlaw Congress have allowed the FDA to run amok for decades going after doctors with the cure. Why? Because if everyone in America knew there are cures for cancer without killing your body with radiation and chemotherapy and a thousand pills a year, the cancer industry would fold like a house of cards and the big pharmaceutical houses would lose BILLIONS every year. YOU need to hammer on your congress critter and tell them to get the hell out of the medical industry. STOP the FDA from arresting and prosecuting or driving decent doctors in this country out of business in legal bills who are curing people safely. DON’T wait until cancer strikes you, your precious child or other family member.

Those reprehensible whores in the Outlaw Congress continue to allow the Federal Death Administration to chip away at the supplement industry in this country because it is cutting into profits for the big pharmaceutical companies who want you hooked on drugs for the rest of your life. The outlaws who serve in Congress are in their home districts now through the election in November. NOW is the time to hit every debate, every public appearance. NOW is the time to get an appointment at your critter’s district office and tell he/she to get the hell out of our lives and leave us alone. We have the absolute right to seek the treatment we want. Neither Congress nor the FDA has any constitutional authority to regulate the practice of medicine in the sovereign states:

Linder v. United States, 268 U.S. 5, 18, 45 S. Ct. 446 (1925): “Obviously, direct control of medical practice in the states is beyond the power of the federal government.”

Lambert v. Yellowly, 272 U.S. 581, 598, 47 S.Ct. 210 (1926): “It is important also to bear in mind that ‘direct control of medical practice in the States is beyond the power of the Federal Government.’ Linder v. United States, 268 U.S. 5, 18. Congress, therefore, cannot directly restrict the professional judgment of the physician or interfere with its free exercise in the treatment of disease. Whatever power exists in that respect belongs to the states exclusively.”

Conant v. Walters, 309 F.3d 629, 639 (9th Cir. 2002) (quoting Linder).

United States v. Anthony et al., 15 F. Supp. 553 (S.D.Cal. 1936) (June 23 1936)
Nos. 12069-12072. United States District Court, S.D. California, Central Division

“I am referring to these facts in order to indicate that we must bear in mind the purpose of the act — that the act is a borderline statute which must be interpreted in such a manner as to bring it within the constitutional power. And if we depart from it and interpret it either as attempting to regulate the disposition and sale of narcotics or attempting the regulation of medicine, we extend the act to the realm which the Supreme Court has repeatedly said the federal government cannot enter, under the penalty of unconstitutionality.

“The Linder Case (Linder v. United States [1925] 268 U.S. 5, 45 S.Ct. 446, 449, 69 L.Ed. 819, 39 A.L.R. 229) is very important. We all seem to agree, whether we read it alike or not, that it determines this case, so far as the law is concerned. I wish to refer to it for the present only for the purpose of pointing out that the moment we assume that this act regulates the sale within the state of narcotics and that it aims to regulate the practice of medicine, we must hold it unconstitutional.

“In the Linder Case, Mr. Justice McReynolds, speaking for the court, made this observation: “Obviously, direct control of medical practice in the states is beyond the power of the federal government.”

NOW is the time to also tell your state rep and senator: The General Government and enforcement agencies like the FDA do NOT have any jurisdiction in your state when it comes to the practice of medicine. Get all your facts together along with a few friends and contact your state rep and senator. They’re all up for reelection so now is the time to make your voice heard.

It’s also the responsibility of every American – especially parents – to do everything you can to avoid getting any type of cancer. That means getting educated on the right foods to eat, what to avoid and learn how to feed your body the natural way. Learning how to treat your body the natural way instead of chemical and synthetic drugs. De-toxing your body of all chemicals. Drinking water through filter systems like Berky. I haven’t had a drop of tap water in decades; my shower and faucets all have filters on them. Do you care enough about yourself and your children to do as I did almost 16 years ago? I have never been overweight and have always done my best not be a burden to others, but when I went natural in 1994, it was the best thing I ever did. I’ve been learning ever since in an effort to stay as healthy as possible.

Stay away from GM foods. Genetically Modified foods pushed by Monsanto, a company whose products should be barred in every state. I have been eating organic for a long time and it’s worth every penny.

I quit using tooth paste and mouth wash in 1994 that contains fluoride. I also use only natural brands of deodorant free of chemicals and here’s why:

99% of Breast Cancer Tissue Contained This Everyday Chemical
Because I’m small, I take one 2,000 IU capsule of Vitamin D everyday.
I quit listening to the hacks on the boob tube who are nothing more than pimps for the big pharmaceutical companies.
Vitamin D May Help Prevent 2 Million Cancer Deaths a Year!
Misleading Americans about Vitamin D
Shocking Story Reveals How the FDA Is Recklessly Abandoning Drug Safety

READ the label – ask your grocery to verify corn you buy is NOT GM (Genetically Modified)

Monsanto GMO Corn Proven to Cause Cancer – Tumors – Organ Damage
Jeffrey M. Smith: The GMO Threat (Full Length • HD)
Europe-wide ban on Monsanto GM corn imminent in wake of French study linking it to cancer
FDA Discounts More Than a Million Signatures On GMO Labeling Petition

Read this book: World Without Cancer – The Story of Vitamin B-17 by G. Edward Griffin

Like Dr. Brownstein, I have never given to any cancer research group. Excellent article:
Too Much Fundraising for Cancer Research
Every Cancer Can be Cured in Weeks explains Dr. Leonard Coldwell

The Cancer Research Money Machine
Diseases – a list I put together full of information

America has been bombarded by aerosol spraying of our skies for close to 15 years.
Dangerously high amounts of aluminum and barium have been found in water supplies and people’s blood:

Toxic Levels Of Barium And Aluminum Found In Several Mohave County Arizona Residents

Symptoms Resulting From Chemtrail Spraying

Americans Putting Noose Around Their Own Necks

Former Presidential candidate and Reform Party founder Ross Perot broke his self-imposed public retirement to make a bold warning: America could be taken over.

Perot was the last man to make a serious independent run for President. That was back in 1992. He withdrew from the race after he and his family had received serious threats against their lives. By the time he had gathered himself enough to reenter the race, all of his momentum was lost and Republican hacks like Rush Limbaugh had a heyday making sport of him. But the things Perot tried to warn us about back then have all come to pass. The economic malaise that currently envelopes this country could have been averted had Presidents and Congresses from both major parties over the past two decades had the sagacity and courage to heed Ross Perot and Ron Paul’s warnings. In fact, looking back, Bill Clinton looks like a fiscal saint compared to fiscal sinners G.W. Bush and Barack Obama.

Yahoo! News covers the story: “Former presidential contender and billionaire Ross Perot is worried that America is a sitting duck for an unnamed foreign invader. In an interview for his new autobiography, Perot said the nation’s weak economy has left us open for a hostile takeover–and neither presidential candidate is the man to save the country.

“Citing an impending fiscal cliff, Perot warned of disaster. ‘If we are that weak, just think of who wants to come here first and take us over,’ the former CEO of info-tech company Perot Systems told USA Today on Monday.

“‘The last thing I ever want to see is our country taken over because we’re so financially weak, we can’t do anything,’ Perot says.

“When asked for his take on the presidential race, Perot added, ‘Nobody that’s running really talks about it, about what we have to do and why we have to do it. They would prefer not to have it discussed.’”

See the report at:


Unfortunately, the vast majority of the American people do not truly understand the danger they are in. The national news media is mostly about NOT reporting what’s going on. The conspiracy of silence by the three major network news shows and the cable news shows is so overwhelmingly successful, the average American citizen truly doesn’t realize how dangerously close our country is to utter destruction–either by an economic collapse or by a nuclear war, or both. And all the two major parties can do is cast all the blame on each other, while the truth of the matter is BOTH major parties in Washington, D.C., are equally culpable for the jeopardous condition in which America now finds herself.

And Ross Perot is right: neither Obama nor Romney have the guts to even discuss (much less work to fix) the real causes of America’s fiscal woes.

Perot is also correct in his observation that America could be “taken over” by a foreign power. While the Bush and Obama administrations were beating the war drums for aggression against Iran, Iraq, Syria, Libya, Yemen, Pakistan, and God only knows who else in the Middle East, they have turned a blind eye and deaf ear to the clear and present danger posed by China and Russia. The fact that China and Russia are salivating over nuclear war with the United States seems totally lost to the State Department, CIA, NSA, DHS, the mainstream media, Barack Obama, Mitt Romney, and 95% of the American people.

Allow me to say at this point that if you live within a couple hundred miles to the east of a major nuclear target area, I would be making plans to relocate NOW. But you do what you want. That’s just what I would do. And in case you do not know where the major nuclear target sites are located in the United States, I highly encourage you to order Joel Skousen’ masterpiece: Strategic Relocation. Learn about it at:


Joel believes that China and Russia will not launch their nuclear attack against us for another ten years or so, but when it happens, it will be the catalyst for both a financial collapse and the rise of a totalitarian government. This leads to my question. Are we going to be taken over (as Mr. Perot is worried about), or are we already being taken over? Is our threat Beijing and Moscow or Washington, D.C.?

Without a doubt, the threat posed by Russia and China is very, very real (unlike the pseudo-threat posed by Iraq, Afghanistan, Iran, etc.). In fact, Russian and China have been preparing their countries’ civil defense and fallout shelters for years. The only such shelters that are being constructed in the United States, however, are those the federal government is building for the power-elite. And that is being done virtually invisibly.

But even short of a nuclear attack from Russia and China, is not the America that we knew, the America that was governed by a constitution, the America that believed in the principles of federalism and limited government, the America that regarded the principles enshrined in the Bill of Rights as sacrosanct, the America that believed in paying its bills, the America that had an intrinsic fear of God within it, ALREADY being taken over?

Virtually every principle upon which America was founded and that guided this nation for over 200 years is being thoroughly expunged. Every one of them! My fear is that by the time a foreign power decides to push the button, the America that will be destroyed will only be a museum of what this country once was. The real America is being destroyed NOW–not by a foreign power, but from within!

As an example, try to wrap your brain around this report: “Close to half of Americans say they are in favour of police departments deploying surveillance drones domestically.

“According to a survey conducted by The Associated Press and The National Constitution Center, 44 percent support the idea of police using unmanned aerial vehicles to track suspects and carry out investigations.

“Only 36 percent said that they ‘strongly oppose’ or ‘somewhat oppose’ police use of drones, according to the survey.

“The poll also found that only one third of Americans say they are significantly concerned about their privacy being eroded by the adoption of drones by police forces throughout the country.

“Thirty-five percent of respondents said they were ‘extremely concerned’ or ‘very concerned’ when asked if they believed that police departments’ use of drones for surveillance would impact their privacy.

“Almost exactly the same number, 36 percent, noted that they were ‘not too concerned’ or ‘not concerned at all’, while twenty-four percent were neutral on the issue, saying they were only ‘somewhat concerned’ about a potential loss of privacy.

“David Eisner, president and CEO of the constitution center in Philadelphia, told the AP that he was somewhat baffled by the response to the poll:

“‘I had assumed that the idea that American police would be using the same technology that our military is using in Afghanistan would garner an almost hysterical response,’ Eisner said. Support for drone use ‘shows that people are feeling less physically secure than they’d like to because they are willing to accept fairly extreme police action to improve that security.’”

See the report at:


So, how could half of the American people be utterly unconcerned or even enthusiastic about this country being turned into a giant surveillance society? Are they so ignorant of history as to not realize that the most glaring observation of every totalitarian regime in modern–or even not so modern–memory was always the implementation of a massive surveillance network within the country? It seems that there is virtually no intrusion into our personal lives and liberties so egregious that the American people will not support it, if it is presented as a way of making them more “secure.”

Today, the vast majority of the American people don’t think twice about the government tracking them and listening to them through their cell phones, spying on their financial transactions, recording their phone conversations, reading their emails, scanning the data on their computers, setting up ubiquitous checkpoints on highways, and now sending drones over their homes and neighborhoods–drones that are currently being used to kill mostly innocent men, women, and children in the Middle East. Yes, you read it right: mostly innocent men, women, and children.

Several credible reports that I have read surmise that for every real “terrorist” that our drones kill in Pakistan and elsewhere, at least fifty innocent civilians are killed. Pray tell, if the people in our government are that calloused and coldhearted to the routine killing of innocent people in other countries, why would one think that they would suddenly develop a soul should they be given the order to kill innocent men, women, and children in this country?

Pray tell, how has this happened? How has it happened that the most courageous defenders of liberty in the world (the American people) have become complacent condoners of tyranny? I place the bulk of the blame on America’s pastors and preachers. For decades, they have told and retold their congregants to “trust the government,” “submit to the government,” “obey the government,” “the government is good,” “the government is of God,” etc. They have bastardized Romans 13 and helped turn free men and women into sheepish slaves of the state.

While Ross Perot worries about America’s takeover from foreign entities, I worry that Americans are putting the noose around their own necks.